REFERENCES
Duncum, P. (2002). Clarifying visual culture art education. Art
Education, 55(3), 8-11.
Efland, A. D. (2002). Art and cognition: Integrating the visual arts in the curriculum. New York, NY: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
Eisner, E. (2001). Should we create new aims for art education? Art Education, 54(5), 6-10.
Freedman, K. (2003). Teaching visual culture: Curriculum, aesthetics and the social life of art. New York, NY: Teachers College Press, and Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
Gibson, M. A., & Larson, M. A. (2007). Visual arts and academic achievement. Journal for Learning through the Arts, 3(1), 2-32.
Hetland, L., Winner, E., Veenema, S., & Sheridan, K. M. (2007). Studio thinking: The real benefits of visual arts education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Hope, S. (2005). Art education in a world of cross-purposes. Arts Education Policy Review, 106(6), 3-16.
Lackey, L., Chou, C-M., & Hsu, P-L. (2010). Seeking coalitions between certified and non-certified art educators. Studies in Art Education, 51(4), 315-326.
Rayala, M. (2010). Technology teachers add engineering (think design). andDesign. Retrieved from http:// anddesignmagazine.blogspot.com/2010/12/technology- teachers-add-engineering.html
Smilan, C., & Miraglia, K. M. (2009). Art teachers as leaders in authentic integration. Art Education, 62(6), 39-45.
Stokrocki, M. (2007). Models of integration in elementary and secondary schools: A short history. In M. Stokrocki (Ed.), Interdisciplinary art education: Building bridges to connect disciplines and cultures (pp. 6-16). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
Stokrocki, M. (2007). (Ed.). Interdisciplinary art education: Building bridges to connect disciplines and cultures. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
Sullivan, G. (2005). Art practice as research: Inquiry in the visual arts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ulbricht, J. (1998). Interdisciplinary art education reconsidered. Art Education, 51(4), 13-17.
Wilson, B. (2003). Of diagrams and rhizomes: Visual culture, contemporary art, and the impossibility of mapping content of art education. Studies in Art Education, 44(3), 214-229.
Winner, E., & Hetland, L. (2000). The arts in education: Evaluating the evidence for a causal link. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34(3-4), 3-10.
Efland, A. D. (2002). Art and cognition: Integrating the visual arts in the curriculum. New York, NY: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
Eisner, E. (2001). Should we create new aims for art education? Art Education, 54(5), 6-10.
Freedman, K. (2003). Teaching visual culture: Curriculum, aesthetics and the social life of art. New York, NY: Teachers College Press, and Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
Gibson, M. A., & Larson, M. A. (2007). Visual arts and academic achievement. Journal for Learning through the Arts, 3(1), 2-32.
Hetland, L., Winner, E., Veenema, S., & Sheridan, K. M. (2007). Studio thinking: The real benefits of visual arts education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Hope, S. (2005). Art education in a world of cross-purposes. Arts Education Policy Review, 106(6), 3-16.
Lackey, L., Chou, C-M., & Hsu, P-L. (2010). Seeking coalitions between certified and non-certified art educators. Studies in Art Education, 51(4), 315-326.
Rayala, M. (2010). Technology teachers add engineering (think design). andDesign. Retrieved from http:// anddesignmagazine.blogspot.com/2010/12/technology- teachers-add-engineering.html
Smilan, C., & Miraglia, K. M. (2009). Art teachers as leaders in authentic integration. Art Education, 62(6), 39-45.
Stokrocki, M. (2007). Models of integration in elementary and secondary schools: A short history. In M. Stokrocki (Ed.), Interdisciplinary art education: Building bridges to connect disciplines and cultures (pp. 6-16). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
Stokrocki, M. (2007). (Ed.). Interdisciplinary art education: Building bridges to connect disciplines and cultures. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
Sullivan, G. (2005). Art practice as research: Inquiry in the visual arts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ulbricht, J. (1998). Interdisciplinary art education reconsidered. Art Education, 51(4), 13-17.
Wilson, B. (2003). Of diagrams and rhizomes: Visual culture, contemporary art, and the impossibility of mapping content of art education. Studies in Art Education, 44(3), 214-229.
Winner, E., & Hetland, L. (2000). The arts in education: Evaluating the evidence for a causal link. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34(3-4), 3-10.
Zimmerman, E. (2009a). “I could interpret an artwork from
my own true feelings:” Intercultural and empowerment
strategies used to teach in an international setting. In
Delacruz, E., Arnold, A., Kuo, A., & Parsons, M. (Eds.).
Globalization, art, and education (pp. 292- 299). Reston, VA:
National Art Education Association.
No comments:
Post a Comment